Nixon wrote:kdm31091 wrote:Nixon wrote:The "offending" post did not push my churning agenda.
Ok but you have to remember bans are not a "one bad post = banned" type of thing all the time. It's also based on history. Track record. If your posts were constantly "on the edge" as in the churning and whatnot, the last "offending" post was merely the final nail in the coffin. You seem incapable or unwilling to understand that you were not banned because of ONE post...you were banned ostensibly because the mods were tired of your history of posts.
When I was banned it was not due to one post. It was due to admittedly going too far in a couple of debate threads. Separate posts. Separate times. Again, a track record. Your agenda (MS/churn/whatever) doesn't line up with what myfico wants, evidently. Can't you just accept that and move on? Fighting to get a ban lifted is almost certainly a waste of time given the multiple warnings and previous bans. You only get so many chances.
I have to say no to that because HF was banned for quoting my post. I'll agree that there was some prejudice in that post getting me banned however.
Let's face it, both and HF got banned because an angry old man didn't feel like being questioned that morning. Plain and simple.
Oh yeah that was also really shitty of you to get her caught up in your shitstorm. I feel quite bad for her.